Trial no.:
|
PACTR202004476254378 |
Date of Approval:
|
24/04/2020 |
Trial Status:
|
Registered in accordance with WHO and ICMJE standards |
|
TRIAL DESCRIPTION |
Public title
|
Comparative study of the outcome of oral versus nasal intubation in neonates and infants undergoing cardiac surgery |
Official scientific title |
Comparative study of the outcome of oral versus nasal intubation in neonates and infants undergoing cardiac surgery |
Brief summary describing the background
and objectives of the trial
|
Children undergoing surgery for congenital heart disease require endotracheal intubation. Many factors may influence the choice between oral intubation and nasal intubation. The practice of oral versus nasal intubation seems to be institutionally based as practice varies widely based on perceived risks and benefits. Nasal intubation is thought to offer less like lihood of dislodgment intraoperatively during transesophageal echocardiography probe placement and manipulation, as well as more comfort postoperatively before extubation (Greene NH et al 2019).
Nasal intubation, however, carries an increased risk of epistaxis associated with traumatic intubation, particularly after systemic heparinization. It is also technically slightly more difficult, and it may be associated with nasal skin breakdown and pressure ischemia during hypothermia and low-flow states. There is additional concern that nasotracheal intubation may be associated with increased risk of sinusitis secondary to obstruction of the normal drainage of the maxillary sinuses (Moore BM et al 2012, Holzapfel L et al 1993).
Presence of particular pathogens in the nasal cavity also has been shown to be associated with surgical site infection in patients undergoing cardiac surgery (Muñoz P et al 2008). However, oral intubation may potentially be associated with oral aversion in neonates intubated for prolonged periods, as well as oral and lingual injury.
Aim of the work and hypothesis
The aim of this study is to compare the outcome of oral and nasal intubation in neonates and infants undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). We will also explore potential associations between the route of intubation and the occurrence of infection, the risk of accidental extubation, oral/nasal injury, postoperative intubation length, and postoperative length of hospital stay.
Our hypothesis is that nasal intubation in neonates and infants undergoing open heart surgery may be better tolerated than the oral intubation with subsequent reduction of the postoperative sedative analgesic requirements which will affect postoperative intubation length, and postoperative length of ICU and hospital stay
|
Type of trial |
RCT |
Acronym (If the trial has an acronym then please provide) |
|
Disease(s) or condition(s) being studied |
Anaesthesia |
Sub-Disease(s) or condition(s) being studied |
|
Purpose of the trial |
Treatment: Devices |
Anticipated trial start date |
22/04/2020 |
Actual trial start date |
01/05/2020 |
Anticipated date of last follow up |
24/11/2021 |
Actual Last follow-up date |
01/12/2021 |
Anticipated target sample size (number of participants) |
200 |
Actual target sample size (number of participants) |
|
Recruitment status |
Recruiting |
Publication URL |
|
|