Trial no.:
|
PACTR202006650810423 |
Date of Approval:
|
11/06/2020 |
Trial Status:
|
Retrospective registration - This trial was registered after enrolment of the first participant |
|
TRIAL DESCRIPTION |
Public title
|
PrEP Implementation of Mothers in Antenatal care |
Official scientific title |
PrEP Implementation of Mothers in Antenatal care |
Brief summary describing the background
and objectives of the trial
|
In a region with 15-20% HIV prevalence, an estimated 20% of HIV-uninfected women could have HIV exposures in pregnancy. In a theoretical scenario of perfect PrEP coverage, all women at risk receive PrEP while no women not at HIV risk receive PrEP. With mandatory PrEP given to all women, all women at risk would be covered but many women not at risk receive unnecessary PrEP. Our premise is that a targeted PrEP model may be closer to perfect coverage than a universal offer/self-select model. Implementing targeted PrEP through strategies that include facilitation of partner testing with self-tests could add HIV prevention benefit by increasing partner HIV diagnosis and treatment similar to the initiation of PrEP among pregnant women. By implementing these strategies and measuring uptake, process, and HIV incidence, we can inform the best health systems model for PrEP delivery in pregnancy.
OBJECTIVES
AIM 1a. To compare universal PrEP (offer to all; women self-select PrEP) to targeted PrEP (limit the offer to women identified as high risk through a standardized risk assessment and partner self-testing) for outcomes reflecting the balance of PrEP effectiveness and avoiding unnecessary PrEP exposure to women at low or no risk of HIV: HIV incidence at 9 months postpartum among all women (including those who did and did not receive PrEP) and proportion of women exposed to PrEP.
AIM 1b. To compare trial arms for proportion of women 'appropriately' on PrEP (risk factors), PrEP adherence (drug levels) and duration, partners with known HIV status, partners on ART; infant outcomes
AIM 2. To estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness of targeted PrEP compared to universal PrEP for women during pregnancy and postpartum, per HIV infection and disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) averted.
AIM 3. To qualitatively assess barriers and facilitators to uptake, adherence, acceptability, and feasibility in universal and targeted PrEP models |
Type of trial |
RCT |
Acronym (If the trial has an acronym then please provide) |
PrIMA |
Disease(s) or condition(s) being studied |
Infections and Infestations |
Sub-Disease(s) or condition(s) being studied |
HIV/AIDS |
Purpose of the trial |
Prevention |
Anticipated trial start date |
04/09/2017 |
Actual trial start date |
15/01/2018 |
Anticipated date of last follow up |
31/12/2020 |
Actual Last follow-up date |
30/04/2021 |
Anticipated target sample size (number of participants) |
5000 |
Actual target sample size (number of participants) |
4451 |
Recruitment status |
Closed to recruitment,follow-up continuing |
Publication URL |
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30850409 |
|