Trial no.:
|
PACTR201511001361390 |
Date of Approval:
|
23/11/2015 |
Trial Status:
|
Retrospective registration - This trial was registered after enrolment of the first participant |
|
TRIAL DESCRIPTION |
Public title
|
PiCCO vs. TED for fluid management is major surgery |
Official scientific title |
Pulse-Induced Continuous Cardiac Output (PiCCO) versus Trans-Esophageal Doppler Monitor (TED) for Optimization of Fluid Management in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery. A Comparative Study |
Brief summary describing the background
and objectives of the trial
|
We designed this prospective, randomized study to evaluate the use of PiCCO system from the fluid and hemodynamic point of view in comparison to the TED in order to maintain an adequate circulatory volume ensuring end-organ perfusion and oxygen delivery to tissues. The primary outcome will be the postoperative morbidity based on number of infectious and other organ complications. Secondary outcome parameters will be the evaluation of two CO monitoring devices from many aspects to detect which is more accurate, easier to use, hospital/ ICU length of stay and all-cause mortality. |
Type of trial |
RCT |
Acronym (If the trial has an acronym then please provide) |
|
Disease(s) or condition(s) being studied |
Major Abdominal Surgery,Surgery |
Sub-Disease(s) or condition(s) being studied |
|
Purpose of the trial |
Treatment: Other |
Anticipated trial start date |
01/11/2014 |
Actual trial start date |
10/11/2014 |
Anticipated date of last follow up |
01/11/2015 |
Actual Last follow-up date |
01/11/2015 |
Anticipated target sample size (number of participants) |
72 |
Actual target sample size (number of participants) |
72 |
Recruitment status |
Completed |
Publication URL |
|
|