Trial no.:
|
PACTR202202706271436 |
Date of Approval:
|
07/02/2022 |
Trial Status:
|
Retrospective registration - This trial was registered after enrolment of the first participant |
|
TRIAL DESCRIPTION |
Public title
|
Gutter Splint method vs Chemical Matricectomy using phenol 88% in the treatment of ingrown toenail |
Official scientific title |
Comparison of Chemical Matricectomy with Gutter Splint method vs Chemical Matricectomy using phenol 88% for Ingrown Toenails: A randomized trial |
Brief summary describing the background
and objectives of the trial
|
Ingrown toenail or onychocryptosis is a common condition mainly affecting the big toes.
Ingrown toenail is mainly due to a conflict between the nail plate and the lateral nail fold which generates local inflammation, severe pain and restriction of daily activity.
The main predisposing factors are: inadequate footwear, repetitive trauma or strain, nails cut too short or congenital anomalies of the nail.
Despite the multiple surgical techniques described in the treatment of ingrown toenails, there is no consensus on the most appropriate method.
Chemical Matricectomy using phenol 88% is a widely used technique, representing the "gold standard" in the treatment of ingrown toenails. It nevertheless induces an irreversible modification of the anatomy of the nail by reducing the width of the nail plate. Recently, the "gutter splint" method has been introduced in the treatment of ingrown toenails. It has the advantage of respecting the anatomy of the nail.
The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerance of 2 techniques for treating ingrown toenails, namely the "Gutter Splint" method and chemical Matricectomy |
Type of trial |
RCT |
Acronym (If the trial has an acronym then please provide) |
|
Disease(s) or condition(s) being studied |
Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases,Surgery |
Sub-Disease(s) or condition(s) being studied |
|
Purpose of the trial |
Treatment: Surgery |
Anticipated trial start date |
01/01/2021 |
Actual trial start date |
|
Anticipated date of last follow up |
31/12/2022 |
Actual Last follow-up date |
|
Anticipated target sample size (number of participants) |
112 |
Actual target sample size (number of participants) |
|
Recruitment status |
Recruiting |
Publication URL |
|
|