Trial no.:
|
PACTR202106521751797 |
Date of Approval:
|
23/06/2021 |
Trial Status:
|
Registered in accordance with WHO and ICMJE standards |
|
TRIAL DESCRIPTION |
Public title
|
Pulsed radiofrequency of suprascapular nerve versus radiofrequency ablation of articular branches of the shoulder for Chronic shoulder pain: a randomized controlled study |
Official scientific title |
Pulsed radiofrequency of suprascapular nerve versus radiofrequency ablation of articular branches of the shoulder for chronic shoulder pain: a randomized controlled study |
Brief summary describing the background
and objectives of the trial
|
Chronic shoulder pain is common in the community that may cause an important functional disability. Rotator cuff disease, shoulder impingement syndrome, adhesive capsulitis, tendinitis and degenerative disease may cause chronic shoulder pain, which can negatively affect upper extremity joint function and life quality by limiting the range of motion of the joint [1].
The treatment of shoulder pain requires an all-around approach, including noninvasive methods (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, physical therapy and rehabilitation), minimally invasive methods (intraarticular steroid injections and suprascapular nerve procedures) and surgical procedures [2].
The suprascapular nerve (SSN) provides 70% of the sensory innervation of the shoulder joint; therefore, SSN procedures (selective nerve blocks, steroid injections and radiofrequency applications) have been reported to be effective in the treatment of acute and chronic shoulder pain [3, 4].
Although rapid pain control can be provided with a SSN block, its short duration of action limits its use in treatment [5]. Longer pain control can be achieved with a neurolysis or neurectomy, but these methods may cause irreversible paralysis in the supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles [1].
The technique of radiofrequency reduces transmission of pain signals. RF can be pulsed or continuous [6]. In continuous thermal radiofrequency (CTRF) treatment, a portion of nerve tissue is heated by the application of current with an oscillating frequency of 500,000 Hz via an electrode up to a temperature of 85 °C. The use of the small thermocouple electrodes allows temperature monitoring and nerve confirmation with motor and sensory stimulation, thus affording selective nerve lesion with minimal risk. The beneficial outcome from such treatments is reported as being 50% pain relief at least for 6 months up to 24 months [7-9].
Thermal RF produces Wallerian degeneration in all nerve fibers, physical disruption of the basal laminae and focal disruption of the perineurium, resulting in delayed axonal regeneration. At a given probe temperature, lesion size may be plotted against exposure time, giving an early linear curve before a steady-state plateau is reached at approximate 60 seconds [10].
Pulsed mode radiofrequency (PRF) lesioning is a nonneurolytic lesioning method for pain relief and can relieve pain without evidence of neural damage [1, 11-13]. It has gained a great popularity among pain physicians in the treatment of chronic shoulder pain due to its long duration of action and the lack of any damage to the targeted and surrounding tissue, thereby reducing the risk of neural damage and neuritis [14].This study will be conducted to compare between the outcomes of pulsed radiofrequency of suprascapular nerve and radiofrequency ablation of articular branches of the shoulder for intractable shoulder pain. Our hypothesis is that pulsed radiofrequency of suprascapular nerve will be more effective in controlling chronic shoulder pain than radiofrequency ablation of articular branches of the shoulder.
|
Type of trial |
RCT |
Acronym (If the trial has an acronym then please provide) |
|
Disease(s) or condition(s) being studied |
Anaesthesia,Injury, Occupational Diseases, Poisoning,Musculoskeletal Diseases,Orthopaedics |
Sub-Disease(s) or condition(s) being studied |
|
Purpose of the trial |
Treatment: Devices |
Anticipated trial start date |
01/07/2021 |
Actual trial start date |
15/07/2021 |
Anticipated date of last follow up |
15/07/2022 |
Actual Last follow-up date |
15/07/2022 |
Anticipated target sample size (number of participants) |
90 |
Actual target sample size (number of participants) |
|
Recruitment status |
Recruiting |
Publication URL |
|
|