Brief summary describing the background
and objectives of the trial
|
Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is the most common chronic nerve pain caused by chickenpox (herpes zoster) viral infection. PHN leads to burning pain that lasts long after the skin rash disappear in some patients. The concomitant inflammation of the ganglion, peripheral nerve, and nerve endings (skin damage) is supposedly responsible for this pain [1]. There are limited pain management options because the underlying mechanisms remains unclear [2, 3].
PHN occurs in a subset of the population suffering from an episode of acute HZ. A meta-analysis of the risk factors for the development of PHN published in 2016 noted that approximately 13% of patients older than or equal to 50 years of age with HZ would go on to develop PHN [4].
Recent studies showed that traditional oral drugs, nerve block therapy (NBT) and pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) can shorten pain duration in some patients. PHN can be severe and debilitating in some cases. However, no single treatment modality reduces pain for all patients with consistent success [5, 6]. Therefore, combinational treatments are needed in many PHN cases [7, 8].
Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) is increasingly being applied to alleviate several types of pain including neuralgia, joint pain, and muscle pain [9-11]. This technique works by delivering an electrical field and heat bursts to targeted nerves or tissues via a catheter needle tip without damaging these structures [12-14].
Conventional radiofrequency (CRF) thermocoagulation exposes target nerves or tissues to continuous electrical stimulation and ablates the structures by increasing the temperature around the tip of the RF needle. In contrast to CRF, PRF applies a brief electrical stimulation, followed by a long resting phase; thus, PRF does not produce sufficient heat to cause structural damage [15].
Although the mechanisms of PRF remain unclear, various researchers have been working toward revealing the underlying processes including structural changes in the principal sensory nociceptors, activation of noradrenergic and serotonergic descending pain inhibitory pathways, inhibition of excitatory nociceptive C-fibers, decreased microglial activity, and decreased formation of inflammatory cytokines [16, 17].
Regional anesthetic procedures, including subcutaneous anesthetic and steroid injections, sympathetic and intrathecal nerve blocks, and ESI, are often used for management of PHN, even though these treatments are not strongly evidence based. Epidural steroid injection (ESI) with the transforaminal and interlaminar administration of steroids and local anesthetics is among the more common treatments for patients with refractory PHN. However, its effectiveness is controversial [18].
A case report by Mehta et al. described a 64-year-old man with refractory thoracic dermatome PHN, 1.5 years after HZ onset; 12 weeks after transforaminal ESI, he had complete resolution of symptoms [19].
Interventional procedures have been frequently conducted by fluoroscopy‐guided or blind methods. However, fluoroscopy‐guided methods have the limitations of radiation risks, hypersensitivity reactions to contrast media, and high cost. Recently, ultrasound (US) has been widely used to treat pain from variable causes; it can be used for cost‐effective, portable, real‐time imaging or visualization of underlying pleura and without radiation risks [20-22].
To the best of our knowledge, there is paucity of studies comparing the efficacy of PRF to ESI in such cases. Therefore, we will conduct the current study.
AIM OF THE WORK AND HPOTESIS
This study aims to compare between the efficacy of ultrasound guided bipolar pulsed radiofrequency of intercostal nerves and steroid injection for post-herpetic neuralgia. We hypothesize that bipolar pulsed radiofrequency of intercostal nerves will provide more prolonged analgesia than paravertebral steroid injection for post-herpetic neuralgia.
|