Trial no.:
|
PACTR201610001828172 |
Date of Approval:
|
18/10/2016 |
Trial Status:
|
Registered in accordance with WHO and ICMJE standards |
|
TRIAL DESCRIPTION |
Public title
|
Effectiveness of Number of Repetition and Hours of Shaping Practice during Constraint Induced Movement Therapy Following Stroke: A Randomized Controll |
Official scientific title |
Effectiveness of Number of Repetition and Hours of Shaping Practice during Constraint Induced Movement Therapy Following Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
Brief summary describing the background
and objectives of the trial
|
Constraint induced movement therapy (CIMT) for the upper limb rehabilitation following stroke has a very strong theoretical evidence base (Wolf et al., 2006; Sirtori et al., 2009; Nijland et al., 2011). However, despite this evidence, its protocol differs remarkably among clinicians and researchers, and this may limit its clinical usability since clinicians may not be certain on which one to use or not. In the literature, some may use 6 hours and others less of shaping and task practice with varied periods of constraint (Sirtori et al., 2009; Nijland et al., 2011). When hours of shaping and task practice and constraint are used, how much shaping or task that is practiced may not be very clear. Consequently, researchers have argued that the use of number of shaping practiced could make a suitable alternative for the existing CIMT protocols (Birkinmeier et al., 2010; Abdullahi et al., 2014). They reasoned that, the new protocol is simple and thus motivational and can be monitored even by the patients themselves. Few studies have already elucidated the feasibility of this new protocol. The aim of the present study is to compare the use of hours of shaping practice and the number of repetitions of shaping practice as protocols of CIMT. |
Type of trial |
RCT |
Acronym (If the trial has an acronym then please provide) |
|
Disease(s) or condition(s) being studied |
Stroke |
Sub-Disease(s) or condition(s) being studied |
|
Purpose of the trial |
Rehabilitation |
Anticipated trial start date |
18/11/2016 |
Actual trial start date |
18/12/2016 |
Anticipated date of last follow up |
18/03/2017 |
Actual Last follow-up date |
30/05/2017 |
Anticipated target sample size (number of participants) |
76 |
Actual target sample size (number of participants) |
76 |
Recruitment status |
Not yet recruiting |
Publication URL |
|
|