Trial no.:
|
PACTR202203635372753 |
Date of Approval:
|
03/03/2022 |
Trial Status:
|
Retrospective registration - This trial was registered after enrolment of the first participant |
|
TRIAL DESCRIPTION |
Public title
|
Using EUS-guided biliary drainage as a primary modality to drain distal malignant biliary obstruction |
Official scientific title |
Primary EUS-guided biliary drainage Versus ERCP biliary drainage in distal malignant biliary obstruction |
Brief summary describing the background
and objectives of the trial
|
For more than three decades, drainage of the bile duct has been carried out using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with a high success rate; however, it is not free of complications;
pancreatitis, bleeding, and perforation are the most common complications, with rates ranging from 3 to 15%. ( Masci E et al., 2003).
When ERCP is not successful, Traditionally those patients have been managed with percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) or surgery (Ferrucci JT Jr et al., 1980). The potential complications associated with these procedures, along with the patient dissatisfaction associated with external drainage make these options less desirable. (Artifon EL et al., 2006).
In recent years, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has evolved from a purely diagnostic procedure to a therapeutic one. Wiersema et al. first reported EUS-guided cholangiopancreatography in 1996. Subsequently, EUS-guided cholangiopancreatography followed by biliary drainage (BD) has been performed with many case reports and series confirming both the success and safety of this technique.
EUS-BD offers several advantages over both PTBD and surgery. First, EUS-BD can be performed at the time of the initial ERCP, without a need for further delay or additional procedures. In addition, EUS-BD provides internal drainage as opposed to the external biliary drain that accompanies PTBD and has been associated with significant patient dissatisfaction. Our study Compare primary EUS- biliary drainage vs. ERCP in malignant obstruction of the distal bile duct: As regard success (technical and clinical), adverse events, timing, costs and need for reintervention. |
Type of trial |
RCT |
Acronym (If the trial has an acronym then please provide) |
|
Disease(s) or condition(s) being studied |
Cancer,Digestive System |
Sub-Disease(s) or condition(s) being studied |
|
Purpose of the trial |
Treatment: Other |
Anticipated trial start date |
01/12/2021 |
Actual trial start date |
01/12/2021 |
Anticipated date of last follow up |
01/12/2022 |
Actual Last follow-up date |
|
Anticipated target sample size (number of participants) |
66 |
Actual target sample size (number of participants) |
|
Recruitment status |
Recruiting |
Publication URL |
|
|