|
Trial no.:
|
PACTR201707002378458 |
Date of Registration:
|
26/06/2017 |
|
Trial Status:
|
Retrospective registration - This trial was registered after enrolment of the first participant |
|
| TRIAL DESCRIPTION |
|
Public title
|
A randomized control trial of two regimens of oral misoprostol solution in induction of labour |
| Official scientific title |
Hourly titrated oral misoprostol solution and 2 hourly static oral misoprostol solution in induction of labour: A randomized controlled trial |
|
Brief summary describing the background
and objectives of the trial
|
The dosage and route of administration of misoprostol have been evaluated in some studies in attempts to determine the appropriate dosing and best route that are compatible with efficacy and safety. In 2012, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) recommended an oral dose of 25mcg misoprostol solution every 2 hours to induce labor using the 2011 World Health Organization (WHO) recommendation for induction of labour. A 2014 Cochrane review of oral misoprostol for labor induction supported the use of oral regimens over vaginal regimen and that the dose of oral misoprostol should be 20 - 25 mcg given every 2 hours. Few studies have also examined the frequency of administration of misoprostol in the induction of labour. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) by Rouzi et al demonstrated that hourly titrated oral misoprostol can provide an efficacious and safe substitute for the expensive dinoprostone vaginal insert. In another RCT where the hourly titrated oral misoprostol was compared with the 2hourly oral dose of 25µg misoprostol recommended by FIGO, the regimen of static-dose misoprostol solution every 2 hours has similar efficacy as the hourly titrated dose regimen but with fewer side effects and complications. In addition, the static-dose every 2 hours regimen is simpler and would allow more widespread use of oral misoprostol for labor induction. This is the only known RCT to have done this comparison and more trials will be need for meta-analysis or Cochrane review on these regimens.
Therefore, this study compared the efficacy and safety of the hourly titrated and two hourly static oral misoprostol solution regimens in the induction of labour at Ekiti State University Teaching Hospital, Ado-Ekiti and its applicability in our setting.
|
| Type of trial |
RCT |
| Acronym (If the trial has an acronym then please provide) |
|
| Disease(s) or condition(s) being studied |
Induction of labour,Pregnancy and Childbirth |
| Sub-Disease(s) or condition(s) being studied |
|
| Purpose of the trial |
Hourly titrated oral misoprostol solution and 2 hourly static oral misoprostol solution |
| Anticipated trial start date |
01/04/2017 |
| Actual trial start date |
01/05/2017 |
| Anticipated date of last follow up |
31/10/2017 |
| Actual Last follow-up date |
30/11/2017 |
| Anticipated target sample size (number of participants) |
136 |
| Actual target sample size (number of participants) |
150 |
| Recruitment status |
Recruiting |
| Publication URL |
|
|