Primary Outcome |
1. Performance of the TV POC test [sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive values] compared to NAAT among asymptomatic and symptomatic pregnant women combined.
2. Performance of the BV POC test [sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive values] compared to Nugent scoring among asymptomatic and symptomatic pregnant women combined.
We define symptomatic as having one or more of the following:
Unusual vaginal discharge, pain during urination, itching or burning of the vulva, sores, blisters, ulcers, warts or rashes in the genital area, lumps and bumps on the genitals, lower abdominal pain
3. The minimal operational characteristics of these POC tests and their acceptability to patients and healthcare providers |
At the end of the study |
Secondary Outcome |
1. Performance of the TV POC test [sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive values] compared to NAAT among asymptomatic only pregnant women.
2. Performance the TV POC test [sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive values] compared to NAAT among symptomatic only pregnant women.
3. Performance of the BV POC test [sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive values] compared to Nugent scoring among asymptomatic only pregnant women.
4. Performance of the BV POC test [sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive values] compared to Nugent scoring among symptomatic only pregnant women.
5. Performance of the TV POC test [sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive values] compared to NAAT among pregnant women grouped by gravidae and parity.
6. Performance of the BV POC test [sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive values] compared to Nugent scoring among pregnant women grouped by gravidae and parity.
7. Performance of the TV POC test [sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive values] compared to NAAT among pregnant women of different age groups: <25, 25-34, >35 and <20, 20-24, 25-29, 30-34, >35.
8. Performance of the BV POC test [sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive values] compared to Nugent scoring among pregnant women of different age groups: <25, 25-34, >35 and <20, 20-24, 25-29, 30-34, >35.
9. Performance of the TV POC test [sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive values] compared to NAAT among pregnant women of different gestational age groups: <20 weeks, >20
10. Performance of the BV POC test [sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive values] compared to Nugent scoring among pregnant women of different gestational age |
At the end of the study |