Trial no.:
|
PACTR202210557026698 |
Date of Approval:
|
24/10/2022 |
Trial Status:
|
Retrospective registration - This trial was registered after enrolment of the first participant |
|
TRIAL DESCRIPTION |
Public title
|
Spontaneous pregnancy rate after hysterosalpingography (HSG) versus saline infusion sonogram done under high pressure (SIStreat( |
Official scientific title |
Spontaneous pregnancy rate after hysterosalpingography (HSG) versus saline infusion sonogram done under high pressure (SIStreat( |
Brief summary describing the background
and objectives of the trial
|
Failure to achieve conception after 12 months of regular unprotected intercourse is defined as infertility.(1) As there are so many causes of delayed conception, mostly known and some still unclear, tubal factor has increased since the last decade, reached up to 30-35% of cases.(2) checking tubal patency is an essential step in the investigations done for sub-fertile couples and is typically performed using hysterosalpingography (HSG) or laparoscopy with chromotubation.(3)
Both HSG and diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) are painful procedures, with well-known hazards of exposure to iodinated X-ray contrast media and ionizing radiation in HSG and possible anesthesia or operative complications in DL.(4)
To overcome these disadvantages, during the last two decades contrast sonography (Hy-CoSy) and saline infusion sonogram (SIS) have been used as alternatives in many countries. One advantage of these techniques is the absence of radiation; another is that these procedures can be performed in an outpatient clinic by a gynecologist. Several studies have shown that the methods have nearly equal sensitivity and specificity compared with laparoscopy as the gold standard for tubal patency checking. (5,6)
Recently, SIS was used as the main step for the assessment of fallopian tube patency, because of its simplicity, safety, and high tolerability with a very low risk of complications, like failure to complete the procedure(7%), pelvic pain (3.8%), vagal symptoms (3.5%), nausea (1%), and post procedure fever (0.8%). (7)
Aim of the work
The aim of this study is to compare between Spontaneous pregnancy rate after hysterosalpingography (HSG) versus saline infusion sonogram done under high pressure (SIStreat) in women suffering from infertility.
|
Type of trial |
RCT |
Acronym (If the trial has an acronym then please provide) |
|
Disease(s) or condition(s) being studied |
Obstetrics and Gynecology |
Sub-Disease(s) or condition(s) being studied |
Fertility-female |
Purpose of the trial |
Treatment: Other |
Anticipated trial start date |
01/03/2020 |
Actual trial start date |
01/04/2020 |
Anticipated date of last follow up |
01/04/2021 |
Actual Last follow-up date |
31/03/2021 |
Anticipated target sample size (number of participants) |
227 |
Actual target sample size (number of participants) |
183 |
Recruitment status |
Completed |
Publication URL |
|
|