Trial no.:
|
PACTR202302883669762 |
Date of Approval:
|
27/02/2023 |
Trial Status:
|
Retrospective registration - This trial was registered after enrolment of the first participant |
|
TRIAL DESCRIPTION |
Public title
|
Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on functional outcome in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled study |
Official scientific title |
Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on functional outcome in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled study |
Brief summary describing the background
and objectives of the trial
|
Whether SCI was traumatic or non-traumatic in origin, it is a very significant health condition. While SCI will always be life-changing, it doesn't have to undermine the possibilities of a good and fulfilling life for individuals. In clinical management of SCI, neurological outcomes are generally determined at 72 hours after injury using American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) scoring system .This time-point has shown to provide a more precise assessment of neurological impairments after SCI .One important predictor of functional recovery is to determine whether the injury was incomplete or complete. As time passes, patients with SCI experience some spontaneous recovery of motor and sensory functions (Waters et al., 2004).
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) rehabilitation techniques, based on protocols that selectively stimulate specific pathways along the central nervous system (CNS), have been found to be effective in enhancing neurological recovery leading to improved functional abilities. It is a procedure that involves repetitively delivering biphasic magnetic pulses over a specific cortical site to provide stimulation of the corticospinal tract , primary motor cortex (M1), and spinal cord, so as to induce neuronal reorganization, which can be largely involved in the control of voluntary movements (Rossi et al., 2015).
Protocols involving rTMS have been used to induce changes in the excitability of neuronal circuits with positive effects at the site of stimulation or transsynaptically at distant sites such as spinal cord circuits. The effect of high-frequency rTMS (i.e. ≥ 5Hz) includes changes in synaptic plasticity resembling long-term potentiation (LTP), as well as shifts in network excitability, activation of feedback loops, and activity dependent metaplasticity (Rossini et al., 2015).
High frequency rTMS over the primary motor cortex (M1) applied at frequencies of five to 20 Hz induces increase in corticospinal excitability as indexed by a significant facilitation of motor responses. (Tergau et al., 2000). It induced changes in motor performance. These changes can be assessed by kinematic recording. Most motor cortical areas are easily accessible by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). This especially applies for the primary motor cortex (M1) and the lateral premotor cortex (Fregni et al., 2006).
According to the previous studies, there is no previous study compared the combined effect of TMS and Body weight supported treadmill (BWST) versus BWST alone. Previous studies revealed the effect of TMS only on spinal cord injury patients or the effect of TMS with program of resisted exercises ,this shown in the study of ( Soren Krogh et al, 2022) .The other studies that combined the TMS with a locomotor training was for a short period of time ,this shown in the study of (Kumru et al 2013 ) ,this study was conducted to cover this gap of knowledge, therefore the aim of this study was to find both the short and long term effect of TMS and BWST on functional outcome & quality of life (QOL) in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury.
This study determined the effect of rTMS combined with physical therapy on functional performance after SCI to enable physiotherapist to use new technology in rehabilitation and treatment.
|
Type of trial |
RCT |
Acronym (If the trial has an acronym then please provide) |
|
Disease(s) or condition(s) being studied |
Nervous System Diseases |
Sub-Disease(s) or condition(s) being studied |
|
Purpose of the trial |
Rehabilitation |
Anticipated trial start date |
15/11/2019 |
Actual trial start date |
01/12/2019 |
Anticipated date of last follow up |
01/05/2022 |
Actual Last follow-up date |
01/02/2022 |
Anticipated target sample size (number of participants) |
50 |
Actual target sample size (number of participants) |
40 |
Recruitment status |
Recruiting |
Publication URL |
|
|