| Changes to trial information |
|
Section Name
|
Field Name
|
Date
|
Reason
|
Old Value
|
Updated Value
|
| Trial Information |
Actual trial start date |
06/04/2023 |
We a revision asking about the actual trial start date and completion date?:
Authors response: We apologize for this missing. The actual start date was on January the 4th 2022 and the completion date was on march the 30th 2022. |
|
04 Jan 2022 |
|
Section Name
|
Field Name
|
Date
|
Reason
|
Old Value
|
Updated Value
|
| Trial Information |
Completion date |
06/04/2023 |
We a revision asking about the actual trial start date and completion date?:
Authors response: We apologize for this missing. The actual start date was on January the 4th 2022 and the completion date was on march the 30th 2022. |
|
30 Mar 2022 |
|
Section Name
|
Field Name
|
Date
|
Reason
|
Old Value
|
Updated Value
|
| Eligibility |
Inclusion criteria |
06/04/2023 |
Reviewer's comment:
Please enter each inclusion and exclusion criterion in its own line.
Authors' response:
We thank the reviewer for the comment and we changed the inclusion and exclusion criterion to put each one in its own line.
|
Inclusion criteria were as follows: athletes aged of 18 to 35 years (Breda et al., 2021) and clinical diagnosis of unilateral PT by an experienced sports physician. PT diagnosis was based mainly on clinical assessment (Malliaras et al., 2015; Owoeye et al., 2018; Rosen et al., 2021). Participants had activity-related patellar tendon pain for at least 3 months (Lee et al., 2020). |
Inclusion criteria were as follows:
-Athletes aged of 18 to 35 years
-Clinical diagnosis of unilateral patellar tendinopathy conducted by an experienced sports physician: diagnosis was based mainly on clinical assessment (Malliaras et al., 2015; Owoeye et al., 2018; Rosen et al., 2021)
-Participants had activity-related patellar tendon pain for at least 3 months (Lee et al., 2020)
|
|
Section Name
|
Field Name
|
Date
|
Reason
|
Old Value
|
Updated Value
|
| Eligibility |
Exclusion criteria |
06/04/2023 |
Reviewer's comment:
Please enter each inclusion and exclusion criterion in its own line.
Authors' response:
We thank the reviewer for the comment and we changed the inclusion and exclusion criterion to put each one in its own line. |
Exclusion criteria were the following: prior knee surgery; corticosteroid injections for PT in the last 12 months; history of lower-limb fracture; any other coexisting knee pathology; recovering from another lower-extremity injury; concussions; visual, vestibular or neurological disorders; or any other disease that may influence balance control. |
Exclusion criteria were the following:
-Prior knee surgery
-Corticosteroid injections for patellar tendinopathy in the last 12 months
-History of lower-limb fracture
-Any other coexisting knee pathology
-Recovering from another lower-extremity injury
-Concussions
-Visual, vestibular or neurological disorders; or any other disease that may influence balance control |
|
Section Name
|
Field Name
|
Date
|
Reason
|
Old Value
|
Updated Value
|
| Eligibility |
Age group |
31/03/2026 |
PACTR Admin |
Adult: 19 Year-44 Year |
Adolescent: 13 Year-18 Year, Adult: 19 Year-44 Year |
|
Section Name
|
Field Name
|
Date
|
Reason
|
Old Value
|
Updated Value
|
| Intervention |
Intervention List |
06/04/2023 |
We received a comment asking why is the description for both groups the same, please clarify.
Authors response:
-The description was the same for the conducted measurements only (at baseline and at follow-up: after 12 weeks): static balance control assessment, dynamic postural control assessment, maximal voluntary isometric contraction of the quadriceps, patellar tendon pain assessment. However, the intervention was not the same.
The control group didn’t do any intervention. Then, after 12 weeks, the follow-up measurements were conducted.
However, the experimental group underwent an eccentric exercise program consisting of standing on the injured leg on a 25° decline board and slowly squat down for 12 weeks. After 12 weeks of eccentric training, they underwent another measurement session.
In order to clarify that, more details have been added to the intervention description for both groups.
|
Experimental Group, Eccentric training, Daily, with 3 sets of 15 repetitions for 12 weeks , 3 months, Static balance control is assessed using a force platform (PostureWin, Techno Concept, Cereste, France; 40-Hz frequency, 12-bits A/D conversion) to record the center of pressure (CoP) excursions. Dynamic balance is evaluated using the Y Balance Test. The maximal voluntary isometric contraction of the quadriceps
is assessed with an isokinetic dynamometer. Patellar tendon pain is assessed using the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment for the Patellar tendon (VISAP) questionnaire. Then, participants undergo an eccentric exercise program consisting of standing on the injured leg on a 25° decline board and slowly squat down. They undergo another measurement session after 12 weeks., 15, |
Experimental Group, Eccentric training, Daily, with 3 sets of 15 repetitions for 12 weeks , 3 months, Static balance control is assessed using a force platform (PostureWin, Techno Concept, Cereste, France; 40-Hz frequency, 12-bits A/D conversion) to record the center of pressure (CoP) excursions. Dynamic balance is evaluated using the Y Balance Test. The maximal voluntary isometric contraction of the quadriceps
is assessed with an isokinetic dynamometer. Patellar tendon pain is assessed using the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment for the Patellar tendon (VISAP) questionnaire.
Then, after baseline assessments, participants underwent an eccentric exercise program consisting of standing on the injured leg on a 25° decline board and slowly squat down for 12 weeks. They underwent another measurement session (follow-up) after 12 weeks., 15, |
|
Section Name
|
Field Name
|
Date
|
Reason
|
Old Value
|
Updated Value
|
| Intervention |
Intervention List |
06/04/2023 |
Reviewer comment:
Why is the description for both groups the same, please clarify
Authors response:
-The description was the same for the conducted measurements only (static balance control assessment, dynamic postural control assessment, maximal voluntary isometric contraction of the quadriceps, patellar tendon pain assessment) at baseline and at follow-up (after 12 weeks). However, the intervention was not the same.
The control group didn’t do any intervention. Then, after 12 weeks, the follow-up measurements were conducted.
However, the experimental group underwent an eccentric exercise program consisting of standing on the injured leg on a 25° decline board and slowly squat down. After 12 weeks of eccentric training, they underwent another measurement session.
In order to clarify that, the following sentence was added to the intervention description of the control group: "The control group didn’t do any intervention."
|
Control Group, no intervention, , 3 months, Static balance control assessed using a force platform (PostureWin, Techno Concept, Cereste, France; 40-Hz frequency, 12-bits A/D conversion) to record the center of pressure (CoP) excursions. Dynamic balance was evaluated using the Y Balance Test. The maximal voluntary isometric contraction of the quadriceps
assessed with an isokinetic dynamometer. Patellar tendon pain was assessed using the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment for the Patellar tendon (VISAP) questionnaire. Then, we will keep track of them through phone calls. They will undergo another measurement session after 12 weeks.
, 15, Uncontrolled |
Control Group, no intervention, , 3 months, At baseline, static balance control was assessed using a force platform (PostureWin, Techno Concept, Cereste, France; 40-Hz frequency, 12-bits A/D conversion) to record the center of pressure (CoP) excursions. Dynamic balance was evaluated using the Y Balance Test. The maximal voluntary isometric contraction of the quadriceps was assessed with an isokinetic dynamometer. Patellar tendon pain was assessed using the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment for the Patellar tendon (VISAP) questionnaire.
The control group didn’t do any intervention and we kept track of them through phone calls. They undergo another measurement (follow-up measurement) session after 12 weeks.
, 15, Uncontrolled |
|
Section Name
|
Field Name
|
Date
|
Reason
|
Old Value
|
Updated Value
|
| Outcome |
OutCome List |
13/12/2025 |
We forgot to put some secondary outcomes |
Secondary Outcome, strength and pain, Prior to intervention and after a 12-week follow-up period |
Secondary Outcome, strength, pain, proprioception and performance, Prior to intervention and after a 12-week follow-up period |
|
Section Name
|
Field Name
|
Date
|
Reason
|
Old Value
|
Updated Value
|
| Ethics |
Ethics List |
03/04/2023 |
PACTR Admin |
TRUE, committee of Protection of Persons in South, Road Manzel Cheker, Sfax, 3029, Tunisia, , 08 Feb 2020, +21671783828, thouraya.fendri.1@gmail.com, 25421_24245_4737.pdf |
TRUE, committee of Protection of Persons in South, Road Manzel Cheker, Sfax, 3029, Tunisia, , 08 Feb 2020, +21671783828, thouraya.fendri.1@gmail.com, 25421_24245_4737.pdf |
|
Section Name
|
Field Name
|
Date
|
Reason
|
Old Value
|
Updated Value
|
| Ethics |
Ethics List |
06/04/2023 |
reveiewer's comment:
Why is the ethics email addressed to an individual, please revise.
Autors' response:
A mistake was made during data entry. We apologize for this mistake and we revised it. |
TRUE, committee of Protection of Persons in South, Road Manzel Cheker, Sfax, 3029, Tunisia, , 08 Feb 2020, +21671783828, thouraya.fendri.1@gmail.com, 25421_24245_4737.pdf |
TRUE, committee of Protection of Persons in South, Road Manzel Cheker, Sfax, 3029, Tunisia, , 08 Feb 2020, +21671783828, cnem@rns.tn, 25421_24245_4737.pdf |