Trial no.:
|
PACTR202306612520344 |
Date of Approval:
|
20/06/2023 |
Trial Status:
|
Registered in accordance with WHO and ICMJE standards |
|
TRIAL DESCRIPTION |
Public title
|
A Comparative Assessment of Ocular Prostheses Motility in Atrophia Bulbi Versus Implanted Anophthalmic Sockets (A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial) |
Official scientific title |
A Comparative Assessment of Ocular Prostheses Motility in Atrophia Bulbi Versus Implanted Anophthalmic Sockets (A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial) |
Brief summary describing the background
and objectives of the trial
|
Loss of an eye caused by cancer, trauma, or congenital defect creates a deep psychological impact on an individual’s life especially social and professional life. There are two types of ocular prosthesis available: Ready-made or “stock: shells, which are readily available, inexpensive and can be fitted instantly; and customized prosthesis, which are tailored and customized to the individual user. Customization is an important aspect of prosthetic rehabilitation which brings the cosmetic appearance to near normal levels, provides a better fit to the eye socket, and less discomfort to the patient in the long term. The aim of this study is to compare the relationship between customized and ready-made ocular prostheses thickness and size and their motility in patients with either atrophia bulbi or implanted anophthalmic sockets.
|
Type of trial |
RCT |
Acronym (If the trial has an acronym then please provide) |
|
Disease(s) or condition(s) being studied |
Eye Diseases |
Sub-Disease(s) or condition(s) being studied |
|
Purpose of the trial |
Treatment: Devices |
Anticipated trial start date |
31/05/2023 |
Actual trial start date |
|
Anticipated date of last follow up |
31/12/2023 |
Actual Last follow-up date |
|
Anticipated target sample size (number of participants) |
40 |
Actual target sample size (number of participants) |
|
Recruitment status |
Not yet recruiting |
Publication URL |
N/A |
|