Trial no.:
|
PACTR202402670134278 |
Date of Approval:
|
29/02/2024 |
Trial Status:
|
Registered in accordance with WHO and ICMJE standards |
|
TRIAL DESCRIPTION |
Public title
|
Superior vena Cava Collapsibility Index versus Pulse Pressure Variability Index for Fluid Management in Major Abdominal Surgeries, a Non-inferiority Study |
Official scientific title |
Superior vena Cava Collapsibility Index versus Pulse Pressure Variability Index for Fluid Management in Major Abdominal Surgeries, a Non-inferiority Study |
Brief summary describing the background
and objectives of the trial
|
Optimization of tissue perfusion and oxygen delivery to the body organs, while avoiding hyper and hypovolemia, remain the cornerstone of hemodynamic care. Debate about the optimum strategy for fluid intervention for abdominal surgery included the type of fluid used and the targeted replacement volume. Major abdominal surgery is a complex procedure with a high incidence of perioperative complications. Restrictive fluid management strategy was not associated with a higher rate of disability-free survival and even was associated with a higher rate of acute kidney injury. 1–3
The importance of the prediction of fluid responsiveness relies on the fact that the fluid loading in such condition may be hazardous for the patient, by causing tissue edema and increasing pulmonary water content. The expected response to fluid infusion is an increase of the cardiac output (CO) or stroke volume (SV), and this response depends mostly on the position of an individual patient on the cardiac function curve, i.e., the Frank-Starling curve4–6. Many indices have been proposed to predict FR, the so-called dynamic indices (pulse pressure variation (PPV), stroke volume variation (SVV), and systolic pressure variation (SPV). However, these studies mainly concern ICU settings, septic, or postoperative patients7–9.
Among dynamic fluid indices, the pulse pressure variation is considered to be the most accurate and frequently serves as a gold standard in the evaluation of new dynamic variables.10
Most of dynamic fluid indices has either limitations or technical difficulties that is maximized in open abdominal surgeries. Using transesophageal echocardiography for SV variability or ventricular measurements is technically difficult and is an existing option in many centers. Obviously, inferior vena cava (IVC) collapsibility; one the commonly used indicator of fluid status, is not applicable in open abdominal surgeries.
Superior vena caval diameter collapsibility index (SVCCI) has been proposed as a non-invasive alternative because of the easiness of the technique and possibility of application in open abdominal surgeries. Intraoperative trans-thoracic doppler over the SVC over the left parasternal area has been described and can be applied without interrupting surgery.
In this study, we will compare the intraoperative measurement of using SVC collapsibility index versus PPV as adynamic index for fluid administration during open abdominal surgeries. Fluid management will be primarily guided by PPV index starting fluid boluses at 13% variability. At the same time, SVCI will be measured and compared to PPV to calculate the sensitivity and specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of SVCI as a fluid index.
|
Type of trial |
Non-Randomised |
Acronym (If the trial has an acronym then please provide) |
|
Disease(s) or condition(s) being studied |
Anaesthesia,Surgery |
Sub-Disease(s) or condition(s) being studied |
|
Purpose of the trial |
Prevention |
Anticipated trial start date |
16/03/2024 |
Actual trial start date |
16/03/2024 |
Anticipated date of last follow up |
15/07/2024 |
Actual Last follow-up date |
|
Anticipated target sample size (number of participants) |
80 |
Actual target sample size (number of participants) |
|
Recruitment status |
Recruiting |
Publication URL |
|
|