Trial no.:
|
PACTR201802003020160 |
Date of Approval:
|
26/01/2018 |
Trial Status:
|
Retrospective registration - This trial was registered after enrolment of the first participant |
|
TRIAL DESCRIPTION |
Public title
|
Comparative Efficacy, Safety And Tolerability Of Three Treatment Regiments For Uncomplicated Falciparum Malaria |
Official scientific title |
Comparative Efficacy, Safety And Tolerability Of Three Treatment Regiments For Uncomplicated Falciparum Malaria: Artesunate (3 Days) + Amodiaquine (3 Days) Vs. Artésunate (3 Days) + Sulfadoxine-Pyriméthamine (1day) Vs. Artésunate (5 Days) |
Brief summary describing the background
and objectives of the trial
|
The spread of malaria parasites resistant to safe and affordable drugs is greatly hampering the
control of malaria in Africa. As a consequence, nearly all sub-Saharan African countries have
either changed their antimalarial treatment guidelines. The WHO now recommends the use of combination therapies rather than monotherapies for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria. The combination therapies have been shown to deter the spread of antimalarial drug resistance and to decrease malaria transmission in South-Est Asia. In Mali, we have documented a steady increase in the prevalence of P. falciparum resistance to chloroquine. A clear choice of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) as new policy was made and studies were initiated to identify the best ACT for Mali. Although the results of these studies were pending, following recommendations from the WHO, the National Malaria Control Program (NMCP) of Mali has selected artemether-lumefantrine as the first line therapy for uncomplicated malaria for sites where microscopic diagnosis of malaria is available. Several studies aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of artemisinine based combination therapies have been conducted. Most of these studies compare artesunate (AS) plus sulfadoxine-pyriméthamine (SP) or amodiaquine (AQ) versus monotherapies with SP or AQ.
These studies show the superiority of the combination over the monotherapies. However, at the
beginning of this study no study comparing AS/AQ vs. AS/SP in the same epidemiological
condition was available. Similarly, no study comparing these combinations to AS monotherapy
was available. The overall aim of this study is to promote evidence-based antimalarial treatment
adjustments in Mali.
General Objective
Test the hypothesis that three-day artesunate combined with AQ and SP are at least as
efficacious as five-day AS alone.
|
Type of trial |
RCT |
Acronym (If the trial has an acronym then please provide) |
|
Disease(s) or condition(s) being studied |
Infections and Infestations |
Sub-Disease(s) or condition(s) being studied |
Malaria |
Purpose of the trial |
Treatment: Drugs |
Anticipated trial start date |
22/12/2002 |
Actual trial start date |
22/12/2002 |
Anticipated date of last follow up |
21/12/2004 |
Actual Last follow-up date |
14/10/2004 |
Anticipated target sample size (number of participants) |
750 |
Actual target sample size (number of participants) |
752 |
Recruitment status |
Stopped early/ terminated |
Publication URL |
|
|