OUTCOMES |
Type of outcome
|
Outcome
|
Timepoint(s) at which outcome measured
|
Primary Outcome |
The diagnostic accuracy of self-collected vaginal samples using the Daye Diagnostic Tampon (DDT) compared to healthcare worker (HCW)-collected cervical swabs for the detection of high-risk Human Papillomavirus (hrHPV) DNA. This will be measured by evaluating the sensitivity, specificity, and concordance of DDT-based self-sampling relative to the standard HCW-collected method, using results obtained from both Real-Time PCR and TruNat Mobile Point-of-Care PCR platforms. |
The primary outcome will be measured immediately after sample collection and laboratory analysis, as both samples will be collected from each participant during a single study visit. |
Secondary Outcome |
Diagnostic Performance of TruNat Mobile Point-of-Care PCR vs. Real-Time PCR - Comparison of sensitivity, specificity, concordance, and predictive values of TruNat in detecting high-risk HPV, using Real-Time PCR as the reference standard. |
Evaluated at baseline, after laboratory analysis of both sample types |
Secondary Outcome |
Acceptability of Self-Collection Using the Daye Diagnostic Tampon (DDT) - Assessed through participant-completed structured questionnaires immediately after sample collection, focusing on comfort, ease of use, privacy, cultural perceptions, and willingness to use or recommend self-sampling in the future. |
Immediately after sample collection |
Secondary Outcome |
Factors Influencing Adoption and Use of DDT Self-Sampling - Identified through qualitative interviews (KIIs and FGDs) with participants, healthcare providers, and stakeholders, exploring social, cultural, and health system factors that support or hinder the adoption of self-collection. |
Dring the implementation and post-trial phases |
Secondary Outcome |
Cost-Effectiveness of Self-Collection Using DDT Compared to HCW Collection - Analysed by comparing the costs and outcomes associated with each method (including diagnostic platform) in terms of cost per HPV-positive case detected, cost per woman screened, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. |
To be assessed during the data analysis and post-trial reporting phase |
Secondary Outcome |
Potential for Integration into Routine Screening Services - Assessed based on provider and stakeholder perspectives, infrastructure requirements, and alignment with existing national cervical cancer screening programs and primary healthcare delivery systems. |
To be evaluated during the final phase of the study |