Trial no.:
|
PACTR201905684437789 |
Date of Approval:
|
27/05/2019 |
Trial Status:
|
Registered in accordance with WHO and ICMJE standards |
|
TRIAL DESCRIPTION |
Public title
|
Bolus or continuous infusion if NTG in acute hypertensive heart failure |
Official scientific title |
Bolus versus Continuous Infusion of Nitroglycerine for treatment of Acute hypertensive heart failure; a randomized clinical study |
Brief summary describing the background
and objectives of the trial
|
Vasodilators are considered one of the mainstay therapies for acute heart failure (AHF) management. For hypertensive patients with AHF, existing guidelines recommend the use of vasodilators to provide preload and afterload reduction. Although vasodilators improve hemodynamics and symptoms in such patients, they provide no apparent benefit on mortality or hospital readmissions. For hypertensive AHF, nitroglycerin is the vasodilating agent of choice, and when given intravenously (IV), is typically administered as a continuous infusion (dose range, 5-400 μg/min). However, continuous infusions of nitroglycerin have been associated with increased health care costs and hospital length of stay (LOS) leading to questions about their utility in management of AHF. When administered in higher doses by intermittent bolus, nitrates result in greater arterial dilation and more substantial reduction in cardiac afterload leading to favorable changes in central pressure dynamics. Existing trial data on the use of bolus, high dose nitrates suggest that such hemodynamic effects may be a-companied by lower rates of endotracheal intubation, myocardial infarction, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission but the real-world impact of this approach on resource utilization has not been evaluated. Based on prior work by few research groups supporting the use of bolus nitroglycerin therapy, its use has become routine in clinical practice as part of the management of dyspneic, emergency department (ED) patients with hypertensive AHF at their institutions. Accordingly, we designed the present study hypothesizing that administration of nitroglycerin by intermittent bolus would be as effective and safe as continuous infusion when compared in a prospective randomized study. To the best of our knowledge, this is the 1st trial in the literature comparing both strategies for NTG use in patients with hypertensive AHF in a prospective randomized fashion. |
Type of trial |
RCT |
Acronym (If the trial has an acronym then please provide) |
BCINAA |
Disease(s) or condition(s) being studied |
Circulatory System |
Sub-Disease(s) or condition(s) being studied |
|
Purpose of the trial |
Treatment: Drugs |
Anticipated trial start date |
01/10/2018 |
Actual trial start date |
|
Anticipated date of last follow up |
01/10/2019 |
Actual Last follow-up date |
|
Anticipated target sample size (number of participants) |
200 |
Actual target sample size (number of participants) |
|
Recruitment status |
Recruiting |
Publication URL |
|
|