|
Trial no.:
|
PACTR202510474240715 |
Date of Registration:
|
22/10/2025 |
|
Trial Status:
|
Registered in accordance with WHO and ICMJE standards |
|
| TRIAL DESCRIPTION |
|
Public title
|
SUFLEX study : Suction-Enhanced PCNL versus Flexible Endoscopy with Suction Assistance for Lower Pole Stones |
| Official scientific title |
Suction enhanced percutaneous nephrolithotomy(PCNL) versus flexible and navigable suction sheath(FANS) –Assisted retrograde intrarenal surgery( RIRS) for management of lower pole renal stones: A prospective Randomized study |
|
Brief summary describing the background
and objectives of the trial
|
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) remains the gold-standard treatment for renal calculi ≥2 cm. However, the evolution of endoscopic technology has expanded the role of flexible ureteroscopy (f-URS) as a minimally invasive alternative for smaller stones.
f-URS offers several advantages over PCNL, including reduced tissue trauma, lower complication rates, and shorter hospital stays. Yet, conventional f-URS has limitations such as incomplete stone clearance and residual dust, leading to postoperative colic and hematuria.
Recent innovations introduced a flexible vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheath (FANS/f-UAS), which enhances irrigation control, suction efficiency, and intrarenal pressure regulation. These advances have improved stone-free rates and operative efficiency, positioning f-URS with FANS as a strong contender to mini-PCNL.
However, comparative prospective data directly evaluating suction-enhanced PCNL versus FANS-assisted RIRS for lower pole stones remain limited. This study aims to fill that gap.
The present study aims to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of two suction-integrated endourological techniques—suction-enhanced mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) and flexible and navigable suction sheath (FANS)–assisted retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS)—in the management of lower-pole renal stones measuring less than 2 cm.
Specifically, the study seeks to assess and compare operative outcomes including stone-free rate, operative time, intra- and postoperative complications, need for postoperative stenting, and hospital stay, in order to determine which approach offers superior efficiency, safety, and patient recovery profile. |
| Type of trial |
RCT |
| Acronym (If the trial has an acronym then please provide) |
|
| Disease(s) or condition(s) being studied |
Urological and Genital Diseases |
| Sub-Disease(s) or condition(s) being studied |
|
| Purpose of the trial |
Treatment: Surgery |
| Anticipated trial start date |
15/11/2025 |
| Actual trial start date |
|
| Anticipated date of last follow up |
30/11/2026 |
| Actual Last follow-up date |
|
| Anticipated target sample size (number of participants) |
100 |
| Actual target sample size (number of participants) |
|
| Recruitment status |
Not yet recruiting |
| Publication URL |
|
|