Trial no.:
|
PACTR201811640750761 |
Date of Approval:
|
19/11/2018 |
Trial Status:
|
Retrospective registration - This trial was registered after enrolment of the first participant |
|
TRIAL DESCRIPTION |
Public title
|
Therapeutic Efficacy Studies (TES) of antimalarial |
Official scientific title |
EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ARTEMETHER-LUMEFANTRINE, ARTESUNATE – AMODIAQUINE AND DIHYDROARTEMISININ-PIPERAQUINE FOR THE TREATMENT OF UNCOMPLICATED PLASMODIUM FALCIPARUM MALARIA IN CHILDREN IN UGANDA |
Brief summary describing the background
and objectives of the trial
|
Title:
Efficacy and safety of artemether-lumefantrine, artesunate – amodiaquine and dihydroartemisinin – piperaquine for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Uganda.
Background:
Early, effective treatment is the cornerstone of malaria control. ACTs are currently the frontline treatments against P. falciparum malaria. The five ACTs recommended for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria are artemether–lumefantrine (AL), artesunate–amodiaquine (AS+AQ), artesunate–mefloquine (AS+MQ), artesunate–sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine (AS+SP) and dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine (DP). Although ACTs are working well in many parts of the world, there is serious concern regarding emerging resistance of malaria parasites to these vital treatments . A new molecular marker for artemisinin resistance, a series of mutations on the Kelch gene on chromosome 13 (K13) has been associated with resistant parasite phenotypes in SE Asia but it is not yet clear if K13 mutations are associated with resistance in Africa. Even more recently, failures of DP have been reported in SE Asia, these are associated with additional parasite polymorphisms, specifically increased plasmepsin copy number and a mutation in an exonuclease gene. These findings are very concerning, as they threaten the efficacy of DP to malaria. However, there is as yet no convincing evidence of DP resistance in Africa. With this background, the appropriate selection of first- and second-line antimalarial medicines and updating treatment strategies and policies for country programs should be based on the efficacy and safety of the medicines against the malaria parasite and should be guided by the results of therapeutic efficacy studies (TES). The efficacy of national first- and second line antimalarial treatments should be monitored at least once every 2 years, and should be conducted in the same regions of the country over time in order to allow analysis of trends . According to WHO policy, a change in an anti |
Type of trial |
RCT |
Acronym (If the trial has an acronym then please provide) |
|
Disease(s) or condition(s) being studied |
Infections and Infestations |
Sub-Disease(s) or condition(s) being studied |
Malaria |
Purpose of the trial |
Treatment: Drugs |
Anticipated trial start date |
01/03/2018 |
Actual trial start date |
03/09/2018 |
Anticipated date of last follow up |
30/09/2019 |
Actual Last follow-up date |
|
Anticipated target sample size (number of participants) |
1000 |
Actual target sample size (number of participants) |
|
Recruitment status |
Recruiting |
Publication URL |
|
|