|
Trial no.:
|
PACTR201901523303171 |
Date of Registration:
|
24/01/2019 |
|
Trial Status:
|
Registered in accordance with WHO and ICMJE standards |
|
| TRIAL DESCRIPTION |
|
Public title
|
A clinical trial comparing casting and skin traction versus frame fixation to repair shin bone fractures |
| Official scientific title |
Feasibility of Ilizarov frame fiXation for closed Tibial fractures in Sierra Leone |
|
Brief summary describing the background
and objectives of the trial
|
Injury results in the death of approximately 5.8 million people each year, as well as severe disability for survivors, the majority of which occur in developing countries. A large proportion of these injuries are fractures or broken bones, with one of the commonest being broken leg bones. Sierra Leone is a country in West Africa and is one of the world’s poorest countries with a very weak healthcare system. There are limited treatment options for patients who break the bones in their legs and many of them have to live with disability or die from their injuries. This study aims to examine the treatment of broken tibia (shin) bones in the main government hospital of Freetown (Sierra Leone's capital), called Connaught Hospital. At present the treatment options for these fractures are casting with plaster of Paris and skin traction. For many of these fractures, this treatment is less than ideal, and often can result in prolonged hospital stay and poor function during and after treatment.
20 patients will undergo treatment as usual, with plaster of Paris and skin traction. The results of this will be compared with 20 patients who will receive a surgical intervention known as Ilizarov frame fixation. This involves a surgical procedure where the fracture is held in place by metal pins and an external frame to hold the broken pieces of bone steady while they heal. We think the benefit of this will be that the patient can walk quicker, get home from hospital quicker and have better bone healing and quality of life in the end. A large part of the study will look to see if the frame can be put in safely in Connaught and what are the costs and benefits of the frame compared to the current treatment. We hope the results will contribute to the implementation of a cost-effective and sustainable fracture fixation service in the future. |
| Type of trial |
CCT |
| Acronym (If the trial has an acronym then please provide) |
FIXT |
| Disease(s) or condition(s) being studied |
Orthopaedics |
| Sub-Disease(s) or condition(s) being studied |
|
| Purpose of the trial |
Treatment: Devices |
| Anticipated trial start date |
01/02/2019 |
| Actual trial start date |
|
| Anticipated date of last follow up |
31/12/2019 |
| Actual Last follow-up date |
|
| Anticipated target sample size (number of participants) |
40 |
| Actual target sample size (number of participants) |
|
| Recruitment status |
Not yet recruiting |
| Publication URL |
|
|