|
Trial no.:
|
PACTR201906776769795 |
Date of Registration:
|
28/06/2019 |
|
Trial Status:
|
Registered in accordance with WHO and ICMJE standards |
|
| TRIAL DESCRIPTION |
|
Public title
|
Determination of the better treatment of erectile dysfunction between exercise and electrical stimulation |
| Official scientific title |
Comparative Efficacy of Aerobic Exercise and Electrical Stimulation in the Management of Erectile Dysfunction |
|
Brief summary describing the background
and objectives of the trial
|
The term male erectile dysfunction (ED) refers to a recurring and persistent condition where a man is unable to achieve or maintain an erection and complete sexual intercourse. ED is usually of multifactorial origin atherosclerosis affecting the pelvic vasculature identified as the major cause. However, conditions associated with reduced nerve and endothelium function, such as aging, hypertension, smoking, hypercholesterolemia, and diabetes, also alter the balance between contraction and relaxation factors.
Therapeutic options for men with ED are mainly pharmacological. However, all of these methods circumvent the patient’s problem temporarily, and patients are not cured of impotence, patients typically remain dependent on these treatments for the remainder of their sexually active lives. An effective treatment that cures the problem permanently is needed.
Previous studies have shown an inverse relationship between physical activity levels and biomarkers of inflammation in both healthy individuals and subjects with cardiovascular condition. Many studies have indicated the role of aerobic exercise in the management of erectile dysfunction. Similarly, there were studies that demonstrated the effectiveness of penile electrical stimulation in the management of ED. Though both of these treatment approaches are cheap, relatively safe without much side effects, and easy to administer, no study was conducted to determine the most effective among them, and most importantly the characteristics of the patients that will best benefit from each.
Therefore, this study is designed to investigate the comparative therapeutic efficacy of aerobic exercises and electrical stimulation in the management of ED. We hypothesized that exercise will be more effective.
|
| Type of trial |
RCT |
| Acronym (If the trial has an acronym then please provide) |
ED |
| Disease(s) or condition(s) being studied |
Urological and Genital Diseases |
| Sub-Disease(s) or condition(s) being studied |
|
| Purpose of the trial |
Treatment: Other |
| Anticipated trial start date |
15/07/2019 |
| Actual trial start date |
15/07/2019 |
| Anticipated date of last follow up |
15/09/2019 |
| Actual Last follow-up date |
15/09/2019 |
| Anticipated target sample size (number of participants) |
24 |
| Actual target sample size (number of participants) |
|
| Recruitment status |
Recruiting |
| Publication URL |
|
|