Trial no.:
|
PACTR201702000942621 |
Date of Approval:
|
19/11/2014 |
Trial Status:
|
Registered in accordance with WHO and ICMJE standards |
|
TRIAL DESCRIPTION |
Public title
|
clinical evaluation of the stability of the immediately loaded dental implants with and without bone grafting materials in the maxillary premolar area |
Official scientific title |
clinical evaluation of the stability of the immediately loaded dental implants with and without bone grafting materials in the maxillary premolar extraction sockets |
Brief summary describing the background
and objectives of the trial
|
background
The greatest alveolar bone volume reduction following an extraction occurs in the first 6 months and goes on over 2 years. In a prospective clinical study, it was demonstrated that 33% of the alveolar ridge width in posterior sites was lost within the first 3 months and 50% after 12 months. In addition, greater bone loss occurred at the buccal than at the lingual plate of the extraction (Bottini, Ricci, Piattelli, Perrotti, & Iezzi, 2012).
Immediate implants have been advocated to preserve soft tissue contour and bone dimension, to minimize the period of edentulism and to reduce the overall treatment time. The concept of immediate placement of dental implants is a well accepted protocol even after removal of a tooth with periapical pathology. However, other studies have questioned that immediate implant placement can prevent bone resorption (Matteo et al., 2013).
Different authors placed dental implants with immediate loading in fresh extraction sockets (occlusal load applied to temporary crowns positioned immediately on implants) from premolar to premolar regions, reporting a survival rate of 100%, with minimal bone crestal loss (Crespi, Capparè, Gherlone, & Romanos, 2012).
To achieve both functional and aesthetic requirements, it might be necessary to plan implant placement after tooth extraction and socket grafting/ridge preservation. Bone graft materials have played on important role in periodontal regeneration for many years. To preserve alveolar bone width and height for implant placement or for prosthetic concerns, allografts, xenografts and alloplasts have been used to graft extraction sites (Hassan & Alagl, 2000).
Objectives:
To compare the clinical an |
Type of trial |
RCT |
Acronym (If the trial has an acronym then please provide) |
|
Disease(s) or condition(s) being studied |
un restorable upper maxillary premolar |
Sub-Disease(s) or condition(s) being studied |
|
Purpose of the trial |
Treatment: Other |
Anticipated trial start date |
10/04/2014 |
Actual trial start date |
30/11/2014 |
Anticipated date of last follow up |
31/01/2016 |
Actual Last follow-up date |
|
Anticipated target sample size (number of participants) |
21 |
Actual target sample size (number of participants) |
21 |
Recruitment status |
Recruiting |
Publication URL |
|
|